About Me

Name: RAS
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 

It looks to me that congress and the states are making two very big boo boos!

 

Bill of Rights

 

Amendment II

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Amendment XIV

Section 1.

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United

States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

It looks to me that congress and the states are making two very big boo boos!

First and foremost, they (being the states and local governments) are totally VIOLATING the second amendment via the 14th amendments, Privileges and Immunities and Due Process clauses.

Second, they are VIOLATING the 14th amendments equal protection clause, by making additional laws that solely target certain minority groups for added protections, leaving out the majority of these additional Privileged Protection Laws! Why is no one suing the federal Government on the merits of the law, they themselves are violating?

Tags: Boo Boos!  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Stick Up For You Self

 Dear Comcast and Anheuser-Busch,

I want you to know how furious I am over your corporations decision to sponsor a race baiting bigot, Al Sharpton. 

Your sponsorship of his organization tells me that your company is indeed supporting people who go out in the country and try to prove racism, when no racism exists, inciting hatred among the people. 

I will cease all purchases of your products and ensure my hard earned dollars do not go to your organization.  In your case Comcast, I tossed you out of my home a year ago and vow to never return to your company!

Thank you for showing me your company's true view of its customers and INVESTORS.
 
 
 

Folks, if they can do it to Rush, they can do it to anyone… 

http://www.nlpc.org/

Sharpton’s Corporate Sponsors Funded Anti-Rush Limbaugh Campaign

Submitted by Peter Flaherty on Wed, 10/14/2009 - 21:38

Email to friendPrinter-friendly

Al Sharpton’s platform for his assault on Rush Limbaugh’s NFL ownership bid was the National Action Network (NAN), which is bankrolled by corporate America.

The following companies were identified this year by NAN as “sponsors”: American Honda, Anheuser Busch, Colgate-Palmolive, Comcast, Entergy, Ford Motor Company, Home Depot, Johnson & Johnson, Macy’s, PepsiCo, Pfizer and Wal-Mart. Sponsorship reportedly cost $50,000.

NLPC is asking these companies to end their support for Sharpton and NAN. Here’s how to contact them:

American Honda
phone: 1-800-999-1009 (Mon.-Fri., 6:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m., Pacific Time)
Fax: 310-783-3023 (24 hours)
Click here to find your local dealer.

Anheuser Busch
email: crg@anheuser-busch.com
1-800-342-5283

Colgate-Palmolive
Click here to send an email.
1-800-468-6502 (Consumer Affairs)
1-212-310-2000 (Corporate Headquarters)

Comcast
Email: complaints@comcast.com
1-800-COMCAST (1-800-266-2278), (24 hours a day, 7 days a week)

Entergy
Click here to send an email.  (go to “Other Questions and Comments” at bottom of page)
1-800-368-3749 x: 4 (Customer Service)
1-504-576-4000 (Corporate Headquarters)

Ford Motor Company
Click here to send an email
1-800-392-3673 (Mon.-Fri., 8:00a.m.-5:00p.m. Local Time)

Home Depot

Click here to send an email.
1-800-553-3199 (M-F 8 a.m. - 8 p.m. ET, Sat: 9 a.m. - 6 p.m. ET, Sun: 12 p.m. - 6 p.m. ET

Johnson & Johnson
Click here to send an email.
1-732-524-0400 (Corporate Headquarters 7:30 a. m.-5:30p.m. ET)
Fax: 1-732-214-0332

Macy’s
Click here to send an email.
Click here for many phone numbers.

PepsiCo
Click here to send an email.
Phone 1-914-253-2000 (Corporate Headquarters)

Pfizer
Click here to send an email.
1-212-733-2323 (Corporate Headquarters)

Wal-Mart
Click here to send an email.
1-800-925-6278 (Customer Service)

These companies were “sponsors” of the NAN convention that took place April 1-4, 2009 in New York City. It is Sharpton’s main fundraising event of the year. Dr. Carl Horowitz, author of our Special Report on Sharpton, attended as observer.

In past years, I have had confrontations with the PepsiCo CEO Indra Nooyi and Colgate-Palmolive CEO Ian Cook at their annual meetings. Both defended their support of Sharpton by claiming they did not agree with everything he says. This is, of course, ridiculous. If a company is funding NAN, it is responsible for Sharpton’s statements and actions on behalf of NAN.

Sharpton wrote an October 12 letter on NAN letterhead opposing Rush’s bid to buy the St. Louis Rams. With the announcement that the bid is apparently going forward without Rush, Sharpton is positively gloating:

If it is true that Mr. Limbaugh has been dropped by the group bidding to buy the Saint Louis Rams, it is a moral victory for all Americans especially the players that have been unfairly castigated by Rush Limbaugh. This decision will also uphold the unifying standards of major sports.

Sharpton and his corporate enablers will only be able to enforce racial double-standards as long as we let them. Contact these companies now. Please let us know what response you get and/or if you find better contact info.

Tags: rush  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Swastika carved into green at Lakeville, Mass golf course

News Link here
 
This IS NOT a symbol of hate as the media describes it.  It is a symbol of frusterated Americans telling the world that Obama is acting like a G.D. Nazi! 
 
I do not condone the act itself in anyway shape or form.  However, I also do not condone the media coverage of this, as a symbol of hate toward Obama.
 
Leave it to the media to get it wrong again!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

They Keep Going Too Far!

The Honorable Arnold Schwarzenegger
Governor of California
State Capitol Building
Sacramento, CA 95814

Re: AB962 &SB585

Governor Schwarzenegger,

In May of this year I emailed you requesting that you veto Bill number 962 on the grounds that it violates my constitutional right to keep and bear arms. This bill, recently signed by you, is an abomination to the second amendment. 

You have threatened to release tens of thousands of prisoners from the states prisons due to budget constraints. We are in the worst economic disaster in 100 years, and you along with the democrats in the assembly have conspired to limit my right to self defense? Criminals will still get the weapons they want. They will still get the ammunition they need for those weapons. Criminals get what they want by obtaining them through illegal means. What makes you so sure this law will make us safer? Do heroin addicts get their smack from legal means sir? NO, they sure do not!  Knowing all of this, you still signed a bill that will limit my right to self defense and the defense of my family.

In your response to me on June 1, 2009, your exact words were “I generally do not take a position on legislation until a bill has reached my desk because it can change significantly from the time it is introduced until the time it is finalized.  For the current session, the California Legislature has until September 11, 2009 to pass legislation, and I have until October 11, 2009 to sign or veto proposed bills.”

No Sir, You are supposed to take a position on bills like this because they are unconstitutional and go against the conservative principles that got you elected, as well as the God given right the people of this state have, to make the choice for themselves whether or not they choose to become a victim of crime. 

Sir, it is because of whimpy statements like this by Republicans like you, that I have distanced myself from the Republican Party. You and people like you, do not hold the conservative views of the founding of this country or for that matter, the founding of this state. Guns are a right to each citizen, granted by the Constitution of the United States, for use of self defense and the defense of others, hunting and sport. 

I will tell you sir, the day you can guarantee a competent police officer can fit in my trousers back pocket, is the day you might get me to think of not needing to provide for my own self protection! However, you will never take away my love for hunting and sport shooting.

Please feel free to call me (Phone number inserted here) and I would be happy to discuss with you my complete displeasure of your job performance. Even though you could pick me up and snap me like a twig sir, you have shown ZERO backbone with the liberal Democrats who continue to destroy what made this country so great. 

I look forward to your being removed from office in 2010! I had much higher aspirations for you, given you are the celebrity body building, action star, Governor. But you sir have been a complete disappointment.

Sincerely and Without Affection,

Ronald A. Smith
 
*******************************************************************************************************
I guess a man who made millions using guns as props in his movies, is too afraid to stand up for something until the bill is passed and sent to his desk for signature!
 
----- Forwarded Message ----
From: "governor@governor.ca.gov" <governor@governor.ca.gov>
To: RAS
Sent: Monday, June 1, 2009 9:00:29 AM
Subject: Re:guns/weapons

Thank you for writing me about Assembly Bill 962 and Senate Bill 585.  I appreciate your suggestions on proposed legislation affecting our state.

I generally do not take a position on legislation until a bill has reached my desk because it can change significantly from the time it is introduced until the time it is finalized.  For the current session, the California Legislature has until September 11, 2009 to pass legislation, and I have until October 11, 2009 to sign or veto proposed bills.

You may continue to follow this and any other bill under consideration by lawmakers at the Official California Legislative website: www.leginfo.ca.gov.  You may also read my legislative messages at www.gov.ca.gov.

Again, I appreciate your interest in California's future.  An informed and engaged public is important for effective government in our state.

Sincerely,


Arnold Schwarzenegger
****************************************************************************************************************************************************************
 
Ronald Smith 
May 29, 2009
The Honorable Arnold Schwarzenegger
Governor of California
State Capitol Building

Sacramento, CA 95814
Re: AB962 &SB585
Governor Schwarzenegger:

I am writing today to oppose these two anti gun bills and trust fully that you will veto them should the leftists vote to approve this legislation.
In today's economic climate, with many people turning to crime in order to make their way through life, the fear you provided of letting thousands of prisoners out early due to budget issues and simply our constitutional right given to us in the second amendment to the US Constitution, I vehemently oppose any legislation that will limit my ability to protect myself, my family and others in the community.
This bill will not make us safer, it is only going to make us less safe.
Once again, I trust that you will agree to veto these bills and know that should this bills pass and you do sign them into Law, there will be countless lawsuits against the already bankrupt state, thus causing even more deficits.

Sincerely,
Ronald A. Smith
Tags: Gun Control  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Fight Fire with Fire

 I have been thinking for quite some time of the arguments from the gun grabbers on the Looney left , that the second amendment is not granted to the individual at the state and local level, only at the federal level; meaning only the federal government is prohibited from making laws abridging these constitutional amendments, not the state and local level...

 If I read the constitution in their eyes then I see this.

The state and local government can:

1.       Pass laws establishing a certain religion and prohibiting others.   They may abridge the freedom of speech and the press.  The people have no rights to peaceably assemble or petition the government for a redress of grievances. 

2.       Prohibit the their own state from maintaining a militia for security purposes. The people have no right to keep and bear arms, not even for self defense.

3.       Any soldier of the state militia, if the state allows a militia, in the time of peace may take quarter in a private home, at the time of his choosing, without permission from the land owner.

4.       Deny you private property rights, you have no private property rights what so ever, or even the right to privacy.  The state and local government can take anything away from you that think you own today, for the good of the collective.

5.       You can be tried twice or more, for the same crime by the state and local government.  It’s only the feds who can’t prosecute you twice for the same crime.  Oh, ya, and forget about the whole self incrimination thing…  You don’t have the right to remain silent or the right to a lawyer.

6.       Deny you the right to a fair or speedy trial.  You don’t need to be told why you’re being prosecuted and no witness must be present to accuse you during your trial.  In fact, you’ may not even be allowed a trial, the police may be judge, jury and executioner.  Only the feds when prosecuting you, have to abide by that little 6th amendment! 

7.       Deny you the right civil suits, the 7th amendment does not apply here.

8.       Impose excessive bail; it's a-ok with us!  And you will be truly cruelly punished!

9.       Deny you  enumerated rights given by the 9th amendment.  Screw you! 

10.   Now the states just might want to keep the 10th amendment and enforce it against the federal government, so they can deny the other 9 bill of rights to the people.
 
If the Supreme court upholds the Chicago gun ban, then we all need to file suit to uphold their ruling on all matter of the constitution at the state and local level, thereby granting the 10th amendment, states rights, supreme law over the federal government.

If the liberal gun grabbing looney left wants to play that game, we can play it right back with them!
Tags: gun ban  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Lies, More Lies and Damn Lies

Two out of three Americans who watched President Barack Obama's health care reform speech Wednesday night favor his health care plans — a 14-point gain among speech-watchers, according to a CNN/Opinion Research Corporation national poll.
 
The sample of speech-watchers in this poll was 45 percent Democratic and 18 percent Republican. 
 
 
September 10, 2009
Posted: September 10th, 2009 10:51 AM ET

WASHINGTON (CNN) — Two out of three Americans who watched President Barack Obama's health care reform speech Wednesday night favor his health care plans — a 14-point gain among speech-watchers, according to a CNN/Opinion Research Corporation national poll of people who tuned into Obama's address Wednesday night to a joint session of Congress.

Sixty-seven percent of people questioned in the survey say the support Obama's health care reform proposals that the president outlined in his address, with 29 percent opposed. Those figures are almost identical to a poll conducted immediately after Bill Clinton's health care speech before Congress in September, 1993.

The audience for the speech appears to be more Democratic than the U.S. population as a whole. Because of this, the results may favor Obama simply because more Democrats than Republicans tune into the speech. The poll surveyed the opinions of people who watched Wednesday night's speech, and does not reflect the views of all Americans.

(Full results after the jump)

About one in seven people who watched the speech changed their minds on Obama's health care plan. "Going into the speech, a bare majority of his audience — 53 percent — favored his proposals. Immediately after the speech, that figure rose to 67 percent," says CNN Polling Director Keating Holland. "But the real question is whether those conversions will last. Bill Clinton got similar numbers after his 1993 address to Congress, but five months later a majority of the country no longer supported his plan."

Fifty-six percent of people questioned say they had a very positive reaction to the speech, with 21 percent indicating they had a somewhat positive reaction and a equal amount suggesting they had a negative reaction. The 56 percent who said they had a very positive reaction is lower than the 68 percent of speech watchers who had a similar reaction to the president's first address to a joint session of Congress in February.

More than seven in ten say that Obama clearly stated his goals, with one in four saying he didn't express his goals clearly.

Three out of four say it's very or somewhat likely that the president will pass most of his proposals on health care reform through Congress, with one in four saying it's unlikely.

Seven in 10 say that Obama's policies will move the country in the right direction, up 10 points from before the speech.

The CNN/Opinion Research Corporation poll was conducted just before and just after the president's speech, with 427 adult Americans questioned by telephone. The survey's sampling error is plus or minus 5 percentage points.

The sample of speech-watchers in this poll was 45 percent Democratic and 18 percent Republican. Our best estimate of the number of Democrats in the voting age population as a whole indicates that the sample is about 8-10 points more Democratic than the population as a whole.

–CNN Deputy Political Director Paul Steinhauser contributed to this report

Read: The full results of CNN's poll

Filed under: CNN poll • Health care • President Obama

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Somebody got it right

WASHINGTON – In an extraordinary breach of congressional decorum, a Republican lawmaker shouted "You lie" at President Barack Obama during his speech to Congress Wednesday.

Rep. Joe Wilson, R-S.C.,
His only mistake was calling Obama to apologize!
Tags: awesome  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Speech

 

After reading the speech and listening to the speech, it was pretty well written and delivered and even had a lot of conservative values to it. However, the praise can be offset with some criticism. I will track these criticisms. 

To begin, the real problem began with the "homework" that was handed out to the schools, that was revised after a lot of outcry; regarding questions like, what can I do for president Obama. Questions like this promote an unconscious commitment to a person, not a country, or in other words, promote him as a demigod rather than a man who holds an office. 

He has a lot of controversial people who make up his cabinet, his advisers and his czars. He’s made a lot of controversial comments about the people of this country and this country in general. Not to mention his ability to make people feel good about how he spoke, rather than listened to what he’s really saying and the words he’s really speaking. 

If one were to add both of the two preceding paragraphs together, then we would conclude (without reading the speech, that he would indeed be delivering something that could be biased and mind altering of the children who are prone to being influenced.

After reading his speech, there are things in the speech that reference ideals like fairness. If we want to run on fairness in this country, then everyone will get the same wage, regardless of their job. There will be no competition  that makes our country strive to be better, and there will be no incentive for people to be great, because their reward is the same as the reward the person who doesn’t give a pooh about what they are doing.  

He makes the remark that anyone can strive to become Senator or Supreme Court Judge Etc, but then goes on to say that the kids can’t be NBA stars, or reality TV stars.  Just who is he to tell kids they can’t be something of this nature?

Maybe you could be a good writer – maybe even good enough to write a book or articles in a newspaper – but you might not know it until you write a paper for your English class. Maybe you could be an innovator or an inventor – maybe even good enough to come up with the next iPhone or a new medicine or vaccine – but you might not know it until you do a project for your science class. Maybe you could be a mayor or a Senator or a Supreme Court Justice, but you might not know that until you join student government or the debate team.

I know that sometimes, you get the sense from TV that you can be rich and successful without any hard work -- that your ticket to success is through rapping or basketball or being a reality TV star, when chances are, you’re not going to be any of those things

Just for fun, to prove to myself just how narcissistic this guy is, I counted 58 references to self in this speech. Again, just for fun… 

To sum up my thoughts on the speech, it was conservative in nature which I thought was a good message to deliver to kids. I feel that the administration’s actions leading up to this speech were controversial and I applaud the actions of all who protested those actions and forced the president and his administration to change their tactics. I feel that fairness should have not been in the speech, and telling kids they could be a Senator or Supreme Court Justice and not an NBA star or other type of star, was kind of ridiculous when there are far more NBA stars or reality stars than there ever have been Senators or Supreme Court Justices. So on a scale from 1 to 10, I will give him a 7.5 because it was conservative in nature. I subtracted 2.5 points for the “homework” leading up to the speech, and the references to fairness and telling kids they can do anything if they work hard, but then contradicts himself and tells kids they can’t do other things whether they work hard or not.

Tags: The Speech  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

58 references to self. Did I miss any?

 
58 references to self
Did I miss any others from this narcissist?

One more thing, there are things in here that are not what we should all think a President should say to children.  This was meant in fun to display BHO's Narcissism...


Prepared Remarks of President Barack Obama

Back to School Event

Arlington, Virginia
September 8, 2009
 

The President: Hello everyone – how’s everybody doing today? I’m here with students at Wakefield High School in Arlington, Virginia. And we’ve got students tuning in from all across America, kindergarten through twelfth grade. I’m glad you all could join us today. 

I knowthat for many of you, today is the first day of school. And for those of you in kindergarten, or starting middle or high school, it’s your first day in a new school, so it’s understandable if you’re a little nervous. I imaginethere are some seniors out there who are feeling pretty good right now, with just one more year to go. And no matter what grade you’re in, some of you are probably wishing it were still summer, and you could’ve stayed in bed just a little longer this morning.

I knowthat feeling. When Iwas young, my family lived in Indonesia for a few years, and my mother didn’t have the money to send me where all the American kids went to school. So she decided to teach me extra lessons herself, Monday through Friday – at 4:30 in the morning.   

Now I wasn’t too happy about getting up that early. A lot of times, I’d fall asleep right there at the kitchen table. But whenever I’d complain, my mother would just give me one of those looks and say, "This is no picnic for me either, buster."

So I know some of you are still adjusting to being back at school. But I’m here today because Ihave something important to discuss with you. I’m here because I want to talk with you about your education and what’s expected of all of you in this new school year. 

Now I’ve given a lot of speeches about education. And I’ve talked a lot about responsibility.

I’ve talked about your teachers’ responsibility for inspiring you, and pushing you to learn. 

I’vetalked about your parents’ responsibility for making sure you stay on track, and get your homework done, and don’t spend every waking hour in front of the TV or with that Xbox. 

I’ve talked a lot about your government’s responsibility for setting high standards, supporting teachers and principals, and turning around schools that aren’t working where students aren’t getting the opportunities they deserve. 

But at the end of the day, we can have the most dedicated teachers, the most supportive parents, and the best schools in the world – and none of it will matter unless all of you fulfill your responsibilities. Unless you show up to those schools; pay attention to those teachers; listen to your parents, grandparents and other adults; and put in the hard work it takes to succeed. 

And that’s what I wantto focus on today: the responsibility each of you has for your education. I wantto start with the responsibility you have to yourself. 

Every single one of you has something you’re good at. Every single one of you has something to offer. And you have a responsibility to yourself to discover what that is. That’s the opportunity an education can provide. 

Maybe you could be a good writer – maybe even good enough to write a book or articles in a newspaper – but you might not know it until you write a paper for your English class. Maybe you could be an innovator or an inventor – maybe even good enough to come up with the next iPhone or a new medicine or vaccine – but you might not know it until you do a project for your science class. Maybe you could be a mayor or a Senator or a Supreme Court Justice, but you might not know that until you join student government or the debate team.

And no matter what you want to do with your life – I guaranteethat you’ll need an education to do it. You want to be a doctor, or a teacher, or a police officer? You want to be a nurse or an architect, a lawyer or a member of our military? You’re going to need a good education for every single one of those careers. You can’t drop out of school and just drop into a good job. You’ve got to work for it and train for it and learn for it.

And this isn’t just important for your own life and your own future. What you make of your education will decide nothing less than the future of this country. What you’re learning in school today will determine whether we as a nation can meet our greatest challenges in the future. 

You’ll need the knowledge and problem-solving skills you learn in science and math to cure diseases like cancer and AIDS, and to develop new energy technologies and protect our environment. You’ll need the insights and critical thinking skills you gain in history and social studies to fight poverty and homelessness, crime and discrimination, and make our nation more fair and more free. You’ll need the creativity and ingenuity you develop in all your classes to build new companies that will create new jobs and boost our economy. 

We need every single one of you to develop your talents, skills and intellect so you can help solve our most difficult problems. If you don’t do that – if you quit on school – you’re not just quitting on yourself, you’re quitting on your country. 

Now I knowit’s not always easy to do well in school. I knowa lot of you have challenges in your lives right now that can make it hard to focus on your schoolwork.

I get it. I knowwhat that’s like. My father left my family when I was two years old, and I was raised by a single mother who struggled at times to pay the bills and wasn’t always able to give us things the other kids had. There were times when Imissed having a father in my life. There were times when Iwas lonely and felt like I didn’t fit in. 

So I wasn’t always as focused as I should have beenI did some things I’m not proud of, and got in more trouble than I should have. And my life could have easily taken a turn for the worse. 

But I was fortunate. I got a lot of second chances and had the opportunity to go to college, and law school, and follow my dreams. My wife, our First Lady Michelle Obama, has a similar story. Neither of her parents had gone to college, and they didn’t have much. But they worked hard, and she worked hard, so that she could go to the best schools in this country.

Some of you might not have those advantages. Maybe you don’t have adults in your life who give you the support that you need. Maybe someone in your family has lost their job, and there’s not enough money to go around. Maybe you live in a neighborhood where you don’t feel safe, or have friends who are pressuring you to do things you know aren’t right. 

But at the end of the day, the circumstances of your life – what you look like, where you come from, how much money you have, what you’ve got going on at home – that’s no excuse for neglecting your homework or having a bad attitude. That’s no excuse for talking back to your teacher, or cutting class, or dropping out of school. That’s no excuse for not trying. 

Where you are right now doesn’t have to determine where you’ll end up. No one’s written your destiny for you. Here in America, you write your own destiny. You make your own future. 

That’s what young people like you are doing every day, all across America. 

Young people like Jazmin Perez, from Roma, Texas. Jazmin didn’t speak English when she first started school. Hardly anyone in her hometown went to college, and neither of her parents had gone either. But she worked hard, earned good grades, got a scholarship to Brown University, and is now in graduate school, studying public health, on her way to being Dr. Jazmin Perez.

I’m thinking about Andoni Schultz, from Los Altos, California, who’s fought brain cancer since he was three. He’s endured all sorts of treatments and surgeries, one of which affected his memory, so it took him much longer – hundreds of extra hours – to do his schoolwork. But he never fell behind, and he’s headed to college this fall. 

And then there’s Shantell Steve, from my hometown of Chicago, Illinois. Even when bouncing from foster home to foster home in the toughest neighborhoods, she managed to get a job at a local health center; start a program to keep young people out of gangs; and she’s on track to graduate high school with honors and go on to college.

Jazmin, Andoni and Shantell aren’t any different from any of you. They faced challenges in their lives just like you do. But they refused to give up. They chose to take responsibility for their education and set goals for themselves. And I expectall of you to do the same. 

That’s why today, I’m calling on each of you to set your own goals for your education – and to do everything you can to meet them. Your goal can be something as simple as doing all your homework, paying attention in class, or spending time each day reading a book. Maybe you’ll decide to get involved in an extracurricular activity, or volunteer in your community. Maybe you’ll decide to stand up for kids who are being teased or bullied because of who they are or how they look, because you believe, like I do, that all kids deserve a safe environment to study and learn. Maybe you’ll decide to take better care of yourself so you can be more ready to learn. And along those lines, I hope you’ll all wash your hands a lot, and stay home from school when you don’t feel well, so we can keep people from getting the flu this fall and winter.

Whatever you resolve to do, I want you to commit to itI want you to really work at it. 

I know that sometimes, you get the sense from TV that you can be rich and successful without any hard work -- that your ticket to success is through rapping or basketball or being a reality TV star, when chances are, you’re not going to be any of those things. 

But the truth is, being successful is hard. You won’t love every subject you study. You won’t click with every teacher. Not every homework assignment will seem completely relevant to your life right this minute. And you won’t necessarily succeed at everything the first time you try.

That’s OK.  Some of the most successful people in the world are the ones who’ve had the most failures. JK Rowling’s first Harry Potter book was rejected twelve times before it was finally published. Michael Jordan was cut from his high school basketball team, and he lost hundreds of games and missed thousands of shots during his career. But he once said, "I have failed over and over and over again in my life. And that is why I succeed." 

These people succeeded because they understand that you can’t let your failures define you – you have to let them teach you. You have to let them show you what to do differently next time. If you get in trouble, that doesn’t mean you’re a troublemaker, it means you need to try harder to behave. If you get a bad grade, that doesn’t mean you’re stupid, it just means you need to spend more time studying. 

No one’s born being good at things, you become good at things through hard work. You’re not a varsity athlete the first time you play a new sport. You don’t hit every note the first time you sing a song. You’ve got to practice. It’s the same with your schoolwork. You might have to do a math problem a few times before you get it right, or read something a few times before you understand it, or do a few drafts of a paper before it’s good enough to hand in. 

Don’t be afraid to ask questions. Don’t be afraid to ask for help when you need it. I do that every day. Asking for help isn’t a sign of weakness, it’s a sign of strength. It shows you have the courage to admit when you don’t know something, and to learn something new. So find an adult you trust – a parent, grandparent or teacher; a coach or counselor – and ask them to help you stay on track to meet your goals. 

And even when you’re struggling, even when you’re discouraged, and you feel like other people have given up on you – don’t ever give up on yourself. Because when you give up on yourself, you give up on your country.

The story of America isn’t about people who quit when things got tough. It’s about people who kept going, who tried harder, who loved their country too much to do anything less than their best. 

It’s the story of students who sat where you sit 250 years ago, and went on to wage a revolution and found this nation. Students who sat where you sit 75 years ago who overcame a Depression and won a world war; who fought for civil rights and put a man on the moon. Students who sat where you sit 20 years ago who founded Google, Twitter and Facebook and changed the way we communicate with each other.

So today, I want to ask you, what’s your contribution going to be? What problems are you going to solve? What discoveries will you make? What will a president who comes here in twenty or fifty or one hundred years say about what all of you did for this country?  

Your families, your teachers, and I are doing everything we can to make sure you have the education you need to answer these questionsI’m working hard to fix up your classrooms and get you the books, equipment and computers you need to learn. But you’ve got to do your part too. So I expect you to get serious this year. I expect you to put your best effort into everything you do. I expect great things from each of you. So don’t let us down – don’t let your family or your country or yourself down. Make us all proud. I know you can do it.

Thank you, God bless you, and God bless America.

 

Tags: Narcisist  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

It's Not About Van Jones!

This morning I learned that Van Jones, the race baiter that he is, has resigned from his unconstitutionally appointed position.  Though I'm very happy to see a man (if you want to call him that) of this caliber fall in the demise of his own positions and words, I had the feeling of this has to be the beginning.  Jones needs to be the first of the approximately 44 (unofficial count, that I have found), that simply need to go.  This person has made the statement that there are forces that misconstrued his words and are the reason for his resignation.  Yes, these forces are the American Public who wants their government officials to be held accountable to their own words, associations and criminal history. 

There are approximately 3 dozen (official list) of these Czar positions.  However, I found another bloggers list of Czars that seems to me to be a little more in depth, http://investigatingobama.blogspot.com/2009/08/compleat-list-of-czars.html and appears to have more than the 3 dozen or so positions listed.  In fact, there are 44 positions, with 7 more being planned.  My thought after reading the list was this is an insane power grab by the executive branch.  But then I looked at Wikipedia’s list of past presidents and czars, and I was astounded to see this really didn't begin with Obama, rather with Roosevelt and good ol G. W. Bush’s expansion of the list.  Love him or hate him, he started the massive influx of unconstitutionally appointed positions.  After review there were several presidents who had their own Czar lists, but it was G. W. Bush, who made the list go into the stratosphere. Even the president’s I tend to despise the most, had relatively few (Roosevelt, Carter & Clinton). 

President's name

In office

Number of
"czar" jobs

Number of
appointees

Franklin Roosevelt

1933-1945

10

15

Harry Truman

1945-1953

6

6

Dwight Eisenhower

1953-1961

1

1

John F. Kennedy

1961-1963

1

1

Lyndon B. Johnson

1963-1969

2

2

Richard Nixon

1969-1974

2

3

Gerald Ford

1974-1977

2

3

Jimmy Carter

1977-1981

2

3

Ronald Reagan

1981-1989

1

1

George H. W. Bush

1989-1993

2

3

Bill Clinton

1993-2001

7

9

George W. Bush

2001-2009

36

46

Barack Obama

2009

32

34

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._executive_branch_czars

Now, I'm not here to jump on Bush for the decision he made to expand the list of unconstitutionally appointed positions, nor am I going to jump on Obama for his decision to expand this list even further to the number approaching 51 from Bush's 36.  I am here to look at the positions, and call for the complete elimination of all of these unconstitutionally appointed positions.  Ok, you got me, yes I’m here to jump on both administrations for these positions. Just who the hell do these people think they are? The thought of the governments expansion, no matter it’s intent, can only have one outcome, TERRIBLE!.

To sum up my thoughts of Van Jones’ early retirement from government service, good riddance to bad rubbish. 

My thoughts on the entire Czar program, close it, NOW! 

My thoughts of Obama overall, RESIGN! 

My thoughts of all in the US Congress, DON’T SEEK RE-ELECTION! 

My thoughts on Glenn Beck and others who have been on this topic, KEEP IT UP!  

My thoughts to everyone reading this, take a stand, and tell this government you value your freedom and expect them to reduce costs, and programs by 99% within 10 years!

God Bless America!

Contact your Senators at http://www.senate.gov/index.htm  Contact the President at http://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/

Check out this site http://www.congress.org/congressorg/home/ | Look up documents here http://www.archives.gov/nae/index.html | Watch your money disappear here http://www.cagw.org/site/PageServer

Ignorance is no excuse for not knowing the laws. 

Tags: Good bye  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Trap

Senators Boxer and Fienstien, 

Earlier last month I sent an email requesting you to not vote for government run healthcare due to its sponsorship of abortion. You have since failed to respond to this email directly. I believe the killing of innocent life, via abortion is a crime against humanity and should be stopped with one exception, the endangerment to the mother’s life. 

However, you have come out very strong with your support for abortion. I find this to be very hypocritical on your part. You devalue the human fetus and believe its murder is justified for the sake of the right to choose yet, you're against firearm ownership, and have been on record that you want to ban guns.

Ma'am, there are more murders of innocent children from abortions in this country every week, than there are of firearm related murders in this country per year. 

I believe you have your priorities completely misaligned with common sense and request that you step down as a US Senator representing the state of California.

Sincerely,

Ronald A. Smith




Once again Boxer and Fienstien dodge the Question. 
Rep. Spieir has yet to respond...
More to come Soon!

From: senator@feinstein.senate.gov <senator@feinstein.senate.gov>
Subject: U.S. Senator Dianne Feinstein responding to your message
To: RAS
Date: Friday, September 4, 2009, 9:51 AM

Dear Mr. Smith:

Thank you for contacting me to express your opposition to a public healthcare option in healthcare reform legislation. I am pleased that you took the time to write to me on an important issue facing our country, and I welcome this opportunity to explain my views.

 I support reforming our healthcare system. The key is to find a healthcare plan that provides coverage, as well as limits cost. My colleagues in the Senate and I have been working on this, but it is a difficult issue and must be carefully thought out. I hope that the Senate Finance Committee will propose a bill which will lay out a way in which we can accomplish these goals and can be effectively merged with the bill passed by the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. 

Other health reforms are also necessary. I strongly believe that any healthcare reform legislation should prohibit coverage denial based on preexisting conditions. Reducing healthcare costs is absolutely essential. Between 2000 and 2007, combined profits for 10 of the country's largest publically traded insurance companies rose 428 percent. I am concerned about the astronomical growth of entitlement spending, which makes up 56 percent of all federal dollars spent in 2009. Health reform must bend the healthcare cost curve, slowing the growth of entitlements in order to reduce our nation's debt and budget deficit.
 
Any Senate health reform bill must improve California's complex health care system, and please know that I am working hard with my colleagues to make health care affordable for all Americans, without adding to the federal deficit.

 Again, thank you for writing. If you have any further questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact my Washington, D.C. office at (202) 224-3841. Best regards.


Sincerely yours,

 

Dianne Feinstein
        United States Senator

Further information about my position on issues of concern to California and the Nation are available at my website http://feinstein.senate.gov/public/. You can also receive electronic e-mail updates by subscribing to my e-mail list at http://feinstein.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=ENewsletterSignup.Signup.


----- Forwarded Message ----
From: "senator@boxer.senate.gov" <senator@boxer.senate.gov>
To: RAS
Sent: Friday, August 21, 2009 3:07:09 PM
Subject: Responding to your message

 

Dear Mr. Smith:

 

Thank you for writing to me about pending health care reform legislation.  I am committed to working with President Obama to ensure that Americans have access to high-quality, affordable healthcare that they can rely on.  With the right legislation, I believe we can greatly improve care for our families, while containing the growing costs of health care.

The status quo is unsustainable- Americans will spend more than $2.5 trillion on health care this year, more than one in every six dollars in the U.S. economy.  In all, we spend twice as much per person on health care than other advanced nations, yet the United States ranks near the bottom of the 30 leading industrialized nations in basic measures of health such as infant mortality and life expectancy. 

The situation is even worse for individual families, who are struggling to afford skyrocketing premiums and increased co-pays and deductibles.  Health care premiums have more than doubled in the last nine years, and one respected study shows that, if we fail to act, the average California family will have to spend 41 percent of its income for health insurance premiums by 2016.

The growing number of uninsured is also contributing to higher costs- 46 million Americans do not have health insurance, and every day, another 14,000 Americans lose their coverage when they become seriously ill or lose or change their jobs.  To make up for the coverage gap, families pay on average an extra $1,100 a year in premium costs.

Moreover, poor regulation of insurance companies means that even those with health insurance coverage are not always guaranteed to get the benefits they are promised.  Every day I hear from Californians who can't get health insurance because of a pre-existing condition, or who are denied the medical treatment prescribed by a doctor because of insurance company bureaucrats.  This is wrong, and we have to do better for our families.

That is why I have joined President Obama and many of my colleagues in support of some basic principles for action. Any health care reform must allow every American who likes their current health coverage to keep it.  Health coverage must be made accessible and affordable, and insurance companies must no longer be allowed to discriminate against those with pre-existing conditions or drop you if you become seriously ill.  We must increase investments in prevention and wellness as that will save billions of dollars.  And health care reform must not add a single dollar to the Federal deficit. 

As we move to enact health care reform, I will fight for a bill that meets these principals.  As a U.S. Senator, I can choose from a wide array of health care plans, and I believe that all Americans deserve this opportunity.

Again, thank you for writing to me.  Please feel free to contact me again about this or other issues of concern to you.


Barbara Boxer
United States Senator


 
 
 
 
 
Subject: NO To Tax Funded Abortion

Dear Senators Boxer and Feinstein and Representative Speier,

I am writing each of you to encourage you not to vote for nationalized health care, as I understand it to be the case that abortion will be funded in this bill, for any woman who wants to rid themselves of the responsibility of parenthood and robs a baby to have a chance at life.

Please vote no to abortion and no to nationalized health care!

Sincerely,
Ronald Smith
Concerned Citizen
Tags: The Trap  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Barbra Boxer the Slime

Dear Barbra,

You responded with the below comments.  You once again failed to address my concerns of your righteousness to both Gen. Walsh and Mr. Harry C. Alford.  I didn’t ask you whether or not you talked with General Walsh, I scolded you on your behavior ma’am!  I scolded you for your behavior to both of these fine men, yet you changed the subject and couldn’t even face the criticism enough to go in public and apologies to these two fine men. 
You truly are an elitist ma’am.  I look forward to your being voted out of office next year!
Truly Yours,
Ronald A. Smith
 

From: "senator@boxer.senate.gov" <senator@boxer.senate.gov>
To: RAS
Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 3:34:43 PM
Subject: Responding to your message

 

Dear Mr. Smith:

 

Thank you for contacting me regarding the recent Senate hearing with Brigadier General Michael Walsh.  I appreciate hearing from you on this matter.

 

Shortly after the hearing, I called General Walsh, and we had a friendly and productive conversation.  We expressed our respect for one another and our determination to work together to protect our nation and communities from natural disasters.

 

Thank you again for writing to me.  Please feel free to contact me in the future about this or any other issue of concern to you.


Barbara Boxer
United States Senator


To: Senator Barbra Boxer  ----- Forwarded Message ---- 
Dear Ma'am,

How dare you address a General (General Michael Walsh) as you did during his briefing to congress last month! Who in the world do you think you are? Trust me Ma'am, if I were still in the Military, I would greet you as Ma'am, only because that is what is bread into every US Service member, otherwise I would call you a much more despicable name that I would not like to use at this time!   

Do you understand that? We are and were all programmed to address women as Ma'am, it's a sign of respect. You're damn lucky he didn't address you as woman after your inept display of self righteousness.

I listened to most of the grilling and at no time, did I hear you sound anything but rude to the man; I honestly don't recall you addressing him as sir or General.

Ma'am, you can and will eventually be replaced in the Senate. I would like to reiterate, you are nothing special! You can't walk on water. You can't cause rainstorms, or drought. You most certainly can’t do anything at all by yourself quite frankly, so why must you act like a spoiled little brat?

Last week when you were addressing Harry C. Alford from the Black Chamber of Commerce, your racism was in full display toward that man. How dare you treat another human being in such a manner? Do you think you are better than that man? I guarantee madam, you are not.

You truly make me sick when you act like a complete a$$ Ma'am! 

  • You make me sick to know that you are a senator from my state! 
  • You make me sick to know you want to force standards on all Americans and business which will place us all in servitude to the government. 
  • You make me sick knowing you love the killing of innocent life with abortion yet cling to the notion that life is precious when it comes to firearms. You Ma’am are a hypocrite to the highest degree!  

Now, grow the hell up and act like the Senator you were elected to be!

Please feel free to call or visit me any time, I would love to tell you how I feel in person!

Truly yours,

Ronald Smith

Tags: boxer  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The President wants to talk directly to your children!

----- Forwarded Message ----
From: RAS
To: Chairman@gop.com
Cc: Rush <ElRushbo@eibnet.com>; mike chruch <kingdude@mikechurch.com>; Brian Sussman <briansussman2@yahoo.com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 2, 2009 10:24:36 AM
Subject: Please File an Injunction Against the President

Dear Chairman Steele,
 
On behalf of the conservative base, please file an injunction against the president from going through with the below event.  I am also sending this request to other conservative outlets, but hope the GOP has it in them to stop the president from going through with this farce.
 
Sincerely,
Ronald Smith

Dear Barrack Obama,

I find it completely abhorrent that you would resort to the lows of addressing children between the ages of 5 and 12, especially without the consent of the parents. These young children are very impressionable and we all know you have resorted to unlawful tactics in the past, and seem to be bordering on unlawful activities once again. 

You, and the rest of the US government do not have the authority to address children without the consent of the parents, and for the sake of the Constitution, I demand that you refrain from your address on the 8th of September, 2009.

I will seek an injunction order if necessary, to prevent you from going though with this farce. 

Sincerely,

Ronald A. Smith

 
 
On September 8th, 2009, Barrack Obama will address children K-6. 
 
Here is what the teachers have to do to prep their young minds for the brainwashing they will receive!
 

PreK-6 Menu of Classroom Activities: President Obama's Address to Students

Across America

Produced by Teaching Ambassador Fellows, U.S. Department of Education

September S, 2009

Before the Speech:

• Teachers can build background knowledge about the President ofthe United States and his

speech by reading books about presidents and Barack Obama and motivate students by asking

the following questions:

Who is the President ofthe United States?

What do you think it takes to be President?

To whom do you think the President is going to be speaking?

Why do you think he wants to speak to you?

What do you think he will say to you?

• Teachers can ask students to imagine being the President delivering a speech to all ofthe

students in the United States. What would you tell students? What can students do to help in

our schools? Teachers can chart ideas about what they would say.

• Why is it important that we listen to the President and other elected officials, like the mayor,

senators, members of congress, or the governor? Why is what they say important?

During the Speech:

• As the President speaks, teachers can ask students to write down key ideas or phrases that are

important or personally meaningful. Students could use a note-taking graphic organizer such as

a Cluster Web, or students could record their thoughts on sticky notes. Younger children can

draw pictures and write as appropriate. As students listen to the speech, they could think about

the following:

What is the President trying to tell me?

What is the President asking me to do?

What new ideas and actions is the President challenging me to think about?

• Students can record important parts of the speech where the President is asking them to do

something. Students might think about: What specific job is he asking me to do? Is he asking

anything of anyone else? Teachers? Principals? Parents? The American people?

• Students can record any questions they have while he is speaking and then discuss them after

the speech. Younger children may need to dictate their questions.

After the Speech:

• Teachers could ask students to share the ideas they recorded, exchange sticky notes or stick

notes on a butcher paper poster in the classroom to discuss main ideas from the speech, i.e.

citizenship, personal responsibility, civic duty.

• Students could discuss their responses to the following questions:

What do you think the President wants us to do?

Does the speech make you want to do anything?

Are we able to do what President Obama is asking of us?

What would you like to tell the President?

• Teachers could encourage students to participate in the Department of Education's "I Am What I

Learn" video contest. On September Sththe Department will invite K-12 students to submit a

1

video no longer than 2 min, explaining why education is important and how their education will

help them achieve their dreams. Teachers are welcome to incorporate the same or a similar

video project into an assignment. More details will be released via www.ed.gov.

Extension of the Speech: Teachers can extend learning by having students

• Create posters of their goals. Posters could be formatted in quadrants or puzzle pieces or trails

marked with the labels: personal, academic, community, country. Each area could be labeled with

three steps for achieving goals in those areas. It might make sense to focus on personal and

academic so community and country goals come more readily.

• Write letters to themselves about what they can do to help the president. These would be collected

and redistributed at an appropriate later date by the teacher to make students accountable to their

goals.

• Write goals on colored index cards or precut designs to post around the classroom.

• Interview and share about their goals with one another to create a supportive community.

• Participate in School wide incentive programs or contests for students who achieve their goals.

• Write about their goals in a variety of genres, i.e. poems, songs, personal essays.

• Create artistic projects based on the themes of their goals.

• Graph student progress toward goals.

Don't belienve me?  Read it for yourself:
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Professor Harry Gates is a Race Baiter

 

Dear Representative and Senators,

I demand that the house and senate denounce the race baiting that is going on with this professor from Harvard, Harry Louis Gates. This person is trying to be a victim when the police responded to a call of a break in. 

This man should have thanked the police for responding, not act like a child when the police responded.

I also DEMAND that the house and senate denounce the Presidents remarks from Wednesday's press conference. His remarks show me that he did indeed listen to his Reverend Wright, for 20 years, as without knowing the facts, he instantly attacked the police. It is completely unbecoming of a President to admit he knows nothing of the incident, yet says the police "stupidly" performed their job. Additionally the Presidents comments are incendiary and race baiting!

Sincerely,

Ronald Smith
 
UPDATE: Obama, the man some believe is "the one," tried to distance himself from his own comments, throw Gates under the bus, and invite the cop who he completly disrespected over to the White House for a beer!
Tags: race  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

More about Crap and Trade

First, let's be clear on climate change.  It is a proven fact that since the beginning of time, the Earths climate has changed rapidly and slowly for the 4.6 billion years or so the Earth has been around.  We've had no atmosphere, we've had acid atmosphere, we've had carbon dioxide atmosphere, and the atmosphere we have today, to include several variants along the way.  We've had severe world wide droughts, and severe world wide rains.  We've had severe heating of the Earth, and severe cooling of the Earth. 

Second, there is more tangible proof that the Earth is actually beginning to descend into a cooling pattern than a warming pattern.  The mere fact that we are in the middle of solar cycle 24, and yet have no real normal sun activity compared to the usual activity means that the sun is producing less radiation, less solar wind, and our earth is getting bombarded with cosmic rays that are causing the earth to actually cool due to mixture of the above.

Additionally, I would like to ask one question, what is Dry Ice made of?  Yes, that's right, your pollutant, Carbon Dioxide! 

Third, the mere fact that you would rather push our economy into the dark ages, on a theory that has no tangible scientific proof to back its claim, is completely shocking to me and angers me to the point just below rage!  
 

How dare you play politics with the lives of 300 million Americans and 20 million illegal immigrants lively hoods?   You would rather see more people get laid off from their jobs because less people can afford fuel for their cars, heating and cooling and anything that uses energy to run, be made, or shipped, than sit on the hill thinking Humans actually have an impact with climate change?  That is one of the Dumbest things I have ever heard!  I feel dumber now that I read that comment from you! If all of these people lose their jobs, who’s going to pay your ridiculous taxes?  Do you plan to borrow more money from the Chinese? 

Fourth, you base your judgment on the word COULD. Someone did a study once that goes out to 90 years from now, and if we don’t save the sea monkey now, it could go extinct in 90 years!  Well you know what Ma’am, if I hit my head on a brick wall arguing with you about this, I could go brain dead, or I could end up with brain damage, or I could have a severe contusion, or I could lacerations.  But maybe I’m smart enough to make it look like I’m beating my head on a brick wall, but not really hitting my head.  See that's the problem with you and your fellow femocrat liberals, you all think you have everything planned out and know what's best for each person in this country, rather than each person having the right to choose their own way, their own energy, their own transprotation etc...  No matter what, you know better than the other 300 million people in this counrty, don't you?  

Fifth, What constitutional authority gives the government the right to intervene in the economy, climate of the planet or manage anything that has to do with energy?  Please cite specific in the constitution that gives these powers to the Federal Government?
 
 You based your entire argument with me using the word COULD!  How baseless can you possibly be?  You make me sad that you are a senator! 


From:
"senator@feinstein.senate.gov" <senator@feinstein.senate.gov>
To: RAS
Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2009 9:20:32 AM
Subject: U.S. Senator Dianne Feinstein responding to your message
 

Dear Mr. Smith:

Thank you for writing to me to express your opposition to establishing a cap-and-trade system to curb greenhouse gas emissions. I appreciate the time you took to write, and I welcome the opportunity to respond.

            I understand that you are concerned that a cap-and-trade system could result in the loss of American jobs and increase energy costs. I believe, however, that the cost of failing to act to address climate change far exceeds the cost of taking the necessary steps to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and make a permanent shift towards clean, renewable energy and energy efficient technologies. A recent study by researchers at Tufts University found that inaction could cost the United States economy as much as 3.6 percent of the gross domestic product, or $3.8 trillion annually, by 2100.  

Please know that I appreciate hearing your concerns, and I will keep your thoughts in mind as I continue working in the Senate to advance measures that address climate change, invest in our economy and increase our energy security.

             Again, thank you for writing. If you have further questions or comments, please contact my office in Washington, D.C. at (202) 224-3841. Best regards.


Sincerely yours,

 

Dianne Feinstein
        United States Senator

Further information about my position on issues of concern to California and the Nation are available at my website http://feinstein.senate.gov/public/. You can also receive electronic e-mail updates by subscribing to my e-mail list at http://feinstein.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=ENewsletterSignup.Signup.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous123Next »